But this got OP into hot water when his ex-wife accused him of pressuring her to become a “housewife” and allegedly ignoring the nutritional requirements of their children.
OP remained steadfast in his belief that he should have given her the money and supported his former partner, despite the opinions of several family members.
It was to be expected that nearly every remark his post received said that he was NTA.
Undoubtedly NTA; there’s no justification for parting with her cash. When she requested for assistance with meals, you were happy to provide it to her! However, one individual said, “She doesn’t want or need help with food.”
She requires or desires money. You shouldn’t have to pay her any money if you have 50/50 custody. She will have to ask for government assistance if she truly needs it. The individual remarked, “She’s acting ridiculously.

Shutterstock
N.T.A. You approached panhandlers in the same way that I do. I won’t give them money, but I will purchase food for them and give it to them. Another reader said, “And it’s pretty disappointing how few people will let me buy them a sandwich or a meal when they want money.”
“NTA, I don’t get why she believes that cooking for her children is a way to be coerced into becoming a housewife… We refer to it as being a typical parent. A third said, “Obviously, she’s nobody’s housewife anyway.